To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (8331 ) 11/9/1998 9:06:00 PM From: d:oug Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 14226
Scott, thanks for the correction on my use of maby. I was suprised not to find it in my dictionary, and suprised to see that maybe was a real word. I read the posts today, and from the shareholders that have posted, I get a feeling of renewed strenght in their belief in GPGI. Also, from the SHORTers posts I detect in their wording that they are trying to give themselves some "wiggle room" so that later they can say that they also saw a possible successful GPGI. I see Dennis DeNoble responding to posts, to clear up misunderstanding. To me this GPGI Company is totally different now, and I hope this statement I just made is soon proven by the greatly improved level of acountability GPGI shows shareholders. If starting today Dennis DeNoble would send to the printer in his office all thos posts that touch on technical issues, then Dennis could summerize them and present them to the engineering people at GPGI so that those at the site know of concerns of shareholders that do not have insider information. This way the official web site could include updates that not only express the official reports, but also include information to "control" unofficial discussions on this thread. Would make it harder for shorters to create facts, and prevent Dennis from spending time trying to put out fires. Commonly done is to print out the posts and circle in that yellow marker text to be reread. Reader could comment in the margins, and the paper sent to each technical GPGI person thru company mail, with the final stop at Mike McKay, then the President of GPGI. Hopefully soon enough technical information will be available in the months to come so that Zeev can expand his analysis from at a far to specifics. Soon Zeev will be able to go inside the onion [peels]. Doug