Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (14101)	11/9/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 67261

Exactly. I would go so far as to say that if a person is racist he may not rightly call him or herself a Republican. The Republican party and all its members who I know eschew such views. JLA

To: Dan B. who wrote (14101)	11/10/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Is it just the "anecdotal" view of a Republican gubernatorial candidate or is it something more? (btw, just what was the stand that he took on this issue? Or are we just assuming what it was, because we all know what it would have been anyway? :-) ) The top Democratic leaders (Clinton, Gore, Gephardt et. al.) would have no problems coming out strongly in favor of such a legislation. In fact, they would have added that it is about time that South Carolina entered the 20th century! But would the top Republican leaders (Lott, Gingrich, DeLay et. al) have the balls to come out openly and strongly in support of the legislation? I think not. And therein lies the rest of the story... Dipy.