SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RAVEL who wrote (24688)11/9/1998 6:31:00 PM
From: Captain Jack  Respond to of 31646
 
RAV--- too early to tell. Talk about AG's "irrational exuberance". Lets see if it can blow the consensus twice more in a row,,, that will push it up! The last thing you want with TAVA is for the consensus to be raised when they have only ever made it once.



To: RAVEL who wrote (24688)11/10/1998 1:53:00 AM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 31646
 
Computerworld: 'playing catch-up'

'EMBEDDED CHIPS
On the business side, we have only three major applications to finish,
and our plan is to finish in March of '99," says Wally Walsh, year 2000
project manager at Pacific Power Co. in Reno, Nev. "On embedded
systems, everybody — not just in this industry, but worldwide — is
playing catch-up.

"We all got a late start in understanding the implications of year 2000
with embedded [systems]. Work-arounds are more difficult because of
how limited testing time is and how complicated some integrated
testing might be," he says. "We have a core team of champions
representing each line of business, and we'll complete the
identification of criticals [and] get those corrected by September
1999."

computerworld.com



To: RAVEL who wrote (24688)11/10/1998 5:15:00 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Dear Ravel: Yes, you are probably correct that taxes will hit in 3rd qtr on. However, it is my hope that by then we will be rising from the 25 cent (2nd qtr) plateau and thus can maintain the momentum. ie if growth rate on revenue is 20% (could be even more with Mangan) then its reasonable to assume that the growth at the bottom line will equal or exceed the additional tax burden. JDN