Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Silkroad -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (25)	11/9/1998 11:43:00 PM
From: ahhaha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 626

Take it away, Frank. Sounds like the only sound to hear. Monk and Coltrane. You like that bebop huh? I put a little bug in Curtis' ear and I'm sure he'll be shooting back. I don't know what's up either. SR's site is cryptic, Palmer's in hiding, and the photonics community has told me it won't work. They say that but they don't say why not. The only reason I'm jazzed about this is because I know it's a boat that will float and is easy to build. I know this from my knowledge of physics. Of course, engineering and business is a world unto itself. There's no big deal about 1 nan lambdas. If we could distribute static magnetic fields along a hollow vacuum waveguide, we could send the world's entire collected information in one gamma ray pulse. 10^18 bps. There is no reason to think tbit transfers through pure are any big deal. The photodiode efficiency seems to me to be where the weak link lies. Maybe I can provoke you guys to get me thinking and row out of these waters.