SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (68159)11/10/1998 11:16:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Steve, >>>If what I am saying is true, the quicker the processors, the closer
they are at hitting the "brick" wall. Only Intel will have the technical and financial
resources to profitably climb over this wall, and make it a one horse race once
again.<<<

I agree with what you say, i.e., the cost of entry and continued participation in the computer hardware market is huge, and not many can afford it. I mean participate and really make a difference and dominate, not having a token x86 like IDT's Winchip. When you add up the cost of architecture, design, simulation, verification, diagnostics, software, process engineering, manufacturing and everything else, the cost is easily in the billions for a significant new chip like Merced. Who else can afford to do it and do it right, i.e., come out with a new chip or system? Intel, IBM, Sun, a Japan-US alliance or two, and AMD, I'll say, valiantly trying. Even Hitachi, a $38 Billion company threw in the towel and signed with IBM to use big Blue's S390 chipset. Hitachi used to do all their own CPU logic and chip design. Not any more.

As far as possibly not being able use all the megahertz Intel can crank out in PCs (hit the wall, which I don't believe) there is absolutely no worry about that for the medium-high end workstation and server chips Intel is also majoring in now. Xeon, Merced etc., will be appreciated for every last MHz and cache byte Intel can muster. Speed kills (the competition) up where these chips play.

Tony



To: SisterMaryElephant who wrote (68159)11/10/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: stak  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Steve, A large number of people will not be "paying" for PCs a few
years down the road!!! They will be free or next to free. Perhaps the only thing worse than a commodity market for Intel is a give away market.

>>such that a consumer or business is willing to pay, say $1000,
for a PC today, they will be equally willing to pay that amount to purchase their next PC
a few years down the road <<
stak