SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (68160)11/10/1998 4:50:00 AM
From: Fred Fahmy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul,

<The fact that the Internet bandwidth is comparatively slow - vis-a-vis Intel's CPU speeds is often tossed out as a reason that FAST CPUs are not useful, nor required.>

Amazing isn't it <ggg>? I guess this guy would argue that if the internet were even slower then all we would need is 386's or 486's.

I think some people forget that the demand/need/use for PC's was around long before the internet became an integral part of the technology revolution.

Also, like most who like to repeat this simple minded thinking, he totally ignores what drives this ever growing global network of PC's. It sure ain't a bunch of segment 0 boxes <ggg>. It's like these guys don't understand that their is an infrastructure behind the internet. To them it's just magic.....a bunch of cheap PC's connected by phone lines.

Speaking of ridiculous. Where's our buddy Tommy K?? Can't believe he is going to let a 52 week high go buy without making more negative comments. Perhaps he is waiting for an all time high <ggg>. His silence has been deafening.

FF



To: Paul Engel who wrote (68160)11/10/1998 8:01:00 AM
From: MONACO  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul...I think you misunderstood, I know there is a need for speed, but what I'm asking is if they widen bandwidth wouldn't Joe Public be demanding faster processors, a need to upgrade immediately to a faster Intel processor, adding to Intel's bottom line and therefore the price of the stock.....don't mean to make it sound like it is all money, but as the bandwidth gets wider does Intel go mucho higher...M



To: Paul Engel who wrote (68160)11/10/1998 9:48:00 AM
From: John O'Neill  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul....I'm out of my 500 short at 87 3/16.....



To: Paul Engel who wrote (68160)11/10/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: stak  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
>>CPU performance SELLS - it is in very high demand - and NO CPU company is
advertising that their new SLOWER DESIGNS will be on the market soon. <<

The slower PC like appliances will come hard and heavy very soon Paul. But you're right they won't bill them as "slower" but rather "easier to use" and cheaper.