Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PINC - Planet City -- Software and Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TENNET who wrote (894)	11/10/1998 8:02:00 AM
From: a. paisley	Respond to of 1754

lets discuss comdex show this weekend it should really be a plus for the company this stock hasn t burnt any one yet i think it could move up quickly by next week

To: TENNET who wrote (894)	11/10/1998 9:18:00 AM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1754

Humbly report, TENNET, against my better judgement I'm going to assume you're serious, and look at your statements one by one. If PINCs CEO made a mistake at his last company, I figure he will be hard pressed to not do the same mistake, or I cant see him getting a third job. Silvio Forigo does not have a "job", HVL.A and PINC are his creations, and he's the #1 officer. He's not being paid (see #reply-6335327 - The Company's Officers and Directors serve without compensation . . . ) and he therefore makes his money by SELLING STOCK he printed in the first place, and got for nothing. Silvio Forigo did not make mistakes with HVL.A, he made out like a bandit, and then started PINC. The HVL.A investors of this now halted pump and dump were the ones that made the mistake, and lost everything. . . .so that management can purchase more shares cheaply, before the big run up . . . Why would the PINC management be buying shares NOW, when they were the ones that created and held ALL the stock in the first place, when it was worth nothing? Are you really this naive, just plain stupid, or trying to deceive others? No it doesn't bother me that PINC has competitors, especially if the competitors are second best. Here, let me show you what a first rate PC y2k solution looks like: gmt-uta.com Now, unlike PINC, that's a company that has class, a product that has REAL endorsements, and sells like hotcakes. (No, I'm not associated with it in any way, nor with any other y2k company with the exception of FBNA, and am not trying to pump GMT-UTA, which I believe is not publicly traded.) With all of the bashing you guys give PINC why is the stock doing so well? Because Silicon Investor discussions are a tiny voice in a vast investing universe, and the PINC management along with the likes of Westergaard is very cleverly hyping the stock in the right places so they can dump it at the top and move on to the next batch of suckers. If you get lucky and dump at the top as well, you may do just fine. However, the bottom can drop out at any moment, just as it did with HVL.A. As Bill said here a while back, PINC is presently in the pump stage. The dump will come later. This is, of course, all just my humble opinion. Cheers, Svejk proofsheet.com