Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Smart Investor who wrote (15092)	11/10/1998 7:16:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Respond to of 27307

Yeah you may be right. I was just trying to counter the Nordstroms argument. People always bring up how Nordstroms will never be replaced by the web. Duh, theyve got a piano player and capuccino. Maybe Starbucks will replace Nordstrom, but it wont be the web. <gg>

To: Smart Investor who wrote (15092)	11/10/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: J. P.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27307

<YHOO can hardly justify the current insane valuation, and be compared with MSFT which has never been in this kind valuation.> "Smart"Investor, Who made the valuation models, and who set in stone that is how the markets must react? The economic Nobel prize winners from Long Term Capital? I think YHOO is going up in price so much not because of traditional valuations such as PE, but because of simple supply and demand for the stock. Lots and Lots of people want the stock, and none of the owners are selling. I've made some good money on YHOO stock, and is my money less green because the PE was "high". Ditto the above for AOL, which in my view will go up another 100 percent in the next year after the split, and I have money on it!