Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (9382)	11/10/1998 10:57:00 PM
From: brian krause	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26850

teevee, I am basing a portion of share value based on the cone sheet. The carsaig cone sheet looks like this glg.ed.ac.uk Picture or theory limited in value Take something like this utexas.edu throw in three glaciers add a little of this (geology from space for EC ) daac.gsfc.nasa.gov I am also including some for the scopeing study which is over an area 850m long and 200 to 400m wide. This by the nature of it's name has limited value. Not a feasibility I also see value in the fact that some kind of major occurrence has happened to fill the granite with kimberlite and these excellent results to date have just scratched the surface of whatever caused this. Add this together and there is an interesting senario of possibilities going into winter drilling. The drilling plans and the plans for a bulk sample are going to give an indication as to how WSP looks at things. If it all pays for itself than the more the better. There are hazards in assuming WSP will be an interesting stock. These include a meteor strike, invasion by aliens that hate diamonds, sudden polar melt, a realienment of the poles. Not to be taken to seriously cause he's full of bull bk