Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rob S. who wrote (25660)	11/11/1998 1:02:00 PM
From: OtherChap	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Amazon did not go down to 113. Those were erroneous quotes on quote.com's live charts. signal online never showed the activity you describe, and I checked my schwab account and the stock never traded anywhere near that price. once again, quote.com's stuff sucks if you're serious.

To: Rob S. who wrote (25660)	11/11/1998 1:05:00 PM
From: OtherChap	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

This is so predictable. Someone on CNBC mentioned that OnSale (ONSL) is in the same biz as Ebay, and the stock is taking off on a tear. This is a mania, and I think even william is beggining to realize this. E-tailers are nothing more than catalog-sales companies with a webpage instead of print. Sure, they save the printing costs of catalogs, but they spend it on incredibly expensive net connections. Would LL Bean be worth 6 billion? I dont think so.. How about would LL Bean be worth 6 billion if they didnt have to pay to print their catalogs? (a more fair comparison) Nope, still not. Sooner or later the suckers will realize this.