SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mama Bear who wrote (35823)11/11/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: Richard Nehrboss  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Barb,

"Correlation does not imply causality."

You missed the point of my silly example. What TAers do is try to extract some correlation between an event (typically a chart pattern) and a resulting stock movement. They then take this "correlation" and apply it to future trades. There are many correlations between external events and market prices that have nothing to do with the market and do not have causal relationships with market. IE the superbowl theory, etc.

There are some events that are causally related, ie, news events etc. That is FA.

Much money and many neurons have been thrown at this issue. If you can give me a set of rules that works over 50 percent of the time, I'd suggest you backtest them and let me know the results... if it's a winner myself and others would likely pay.

Which brings me to another point... Breadth, which according to Cohen, Zinbarg, and Zeikel, is the most widely used TA indicator has no funds based on it, at least none of the top performing... wonder why?

I will concede a slight point.. if enough TAers have enough dollars and all think they see a "head and shoulders" top, you might have a self-fulfilling prophecy in a decline. Examples like this might be the only use of TA....?

Enjoyable debate,
Richard

PS your portfolio performance is great, and I commend you. Hopefully you can maintain such great returns.. Do you use level II? Momentum plays I'd guess?



To: Mama Bear who wrote (35823)11/11/1998 5:32:00 PM
From: Richard Nehrboss  Respond to of 132070
 
Barb,

I forgot:

A coin does not land on heads or tails for a specific reason

Indeed it's results are dependant on a specific set of causes, ie, rotational velocity, torque, height, air density, elasticity of the surface it lands on, etc. We live in world that has no truly random events...

Thanks Pierre-Simon LaPlace!

Richard