SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Len Roselli who wrote (68396)11/11/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
As long as I see the games ML plays on it's customers I'll never let up on Tom Quak-Quak.
Jim



To: Len Roselli who wrote (68396)11/11/1998 5:09:00 PM
From: Ann Janssen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Len,

We had a 2/1 stock split last summer so actually he would be WRONG in saying we are at the same place. If you do the math we are up 100% since last summer. 104 split 52 back to 104. Ok, it took us a while to get here and I don't remember the exact number we were at when we split but it was much higher than 102 more like 160ish. Someone please correct me if my logic is completely wrong.

Rgds

Ann



To: Len Roselli who wrote (68396)11/11/1998 6:12:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
From: Michael D.Burke
Wednesday, Nov 11 1998 5:10PM ET
Reply # of 35850

James, It is easy to say Skeets is wrong. But it is impossible to say where
there is any earnings growth. Still a down year, no matter how hard you shout
or how dizzy Intel spins BS to the Great Unwashed.

MB