SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (25719)11/11/1998 7:56:00 PM
From: L.J. Hoffman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Is the part I bolded accurate specifically to AMZN?

Nope...AMZN came close but don't think it hit an all time high. But the article is more evidence of how little distinction there is in the minds of journalists [and many investors] between the big three.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (25719)11/11/1998 7:59:00 PM
From: cellhigh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
a mistake of mine that may be confirmed in the a.m. is that
i thought aol would be a bit immune from the selling panic
(as it generally was during the buying frenzy in the past days)
if she underperforms the likes of amzn in the next session i will
take profits and run to intc.
it would pleasantly surprise me if she held her ground,although looking
at the charts i expect the big guys to flush weak hands out with
wreckless abandon,for a week or so,and i dont want to be at 126, like
i think they may push for. she will comeback fersure.
fwiw of course...rizz



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (25719)11/11/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Glenn, Nah, Amzn's all time high was $147. I will remember it forever!! Which means that was it!



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (25719)11/11/1998 8:46:00 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Respond to of 164684
 
>>Is the part I bolded accurate specifically to AMZN?

No.