Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (4900)	11/12/1998 12:39:00 AM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

"Greg Smith PLEASE, don't expect everyone on this board to ....." stretch our minds or open our eyes. Just cheer. (What I.N. is really saying)

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (4900)	11/12/1998 1:48:00 AM
From: Greg Smith	Respond to of 27311

Fair enough.

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (4900)	11/12/1998 2:26:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 27311

<<Lev's lack of concern about Jan 27 does not imply he's ignorant about important facts.>> Actually, Lev did not indicate a lack of concern about Jan 27. He acted ignorant of any significance to this date by saying something like the conversion is tied to stock price level. It is your spin to say he was unconcerned rather than ignorant. <<He's not paying attention to that date, not because he's dumb, but because he knows it does not matter. I.e. he's weeks away from signing a contract but he could not tell you that on the call, as he carefully explained.>> That is one interpretation you can put on his supposed ignorance of the significance of Jan 27. Another interpretation is that he is very aware of the significance of that date. Therefore, no answer to the question about whether OEMs are receiving production samples and the supposed ignorance about financing terms. <<Go ahead and obsess all you want before deciding, but please try not to take up so much band width insisting that everybody help you get unconfused>> I have seen few threads less tolerant of those with reasonable questions to ask. Given the poor track record of the "inside information" posted on this thread over the months, this thread should be welcoming with open arms somebody asking reasonable questions, rather than dismissing those questions as "wasted bandwidth."