Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : LGOV - Largo Vista Group, Ltd. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: articwarrior who wrote (2258)	11/12/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: jmhollen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7209

Appreciate your input. I am technically more familiar with LNG and gaseous Natural Gas as fuel for emergency generator sets at businesses, hospitals, and condominium residences. Also, these fuel gasses are broadly used for forklift trucks operating indoors, and utility company fleet vehicles. I do know that LPG has approximately the same caloric (usable energy) value as LNG, but I may need to review the chemistry and chat with my cousin who's a professional Chem-E. I would appreciate a specific location to obtain a copy of the study you mentioned, as the information on systems I am more familiar with definitely contradict that. Or, if you could post a copy - that would be great. It's possible that a high ethanol content gasoline run in a very precisely tuned "smogged" engine could produce the results you mention. The reality of personally owned, day-to-day driven vehicles producing less pollution than LPG/LNG fueled vehicles is pretty suspicious to me. But, I'm certainly open to new data! Have a great day, and check out largovista.com John :-)