Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: accountclosed who wrote (35908)	11/12/1998 7:10:00 AM
From: eddie r gammon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 132070

But he is a M I T PhD. Oh my that makes him twice as dangerous (g) erg

To: accountclosed who wrote (35908)	11/12/1998 7:54:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 132070

ar, all i've said is that intel isn't a growth company. james is obsessed with me being wrong but he can't produce growth for intel and ignores me when i reasonably ask for proof intel is growing. last q he compared the qs sequentially to prove growth when yty no growth was ignored. now, maybe back to school occurs every q now or he's a dope ;-) place your bets ;-) paul agrees intel isn't growing earnings. he says intel is behind in production and everyone is all hot and bothered for intel parts. well, why are revenues at record levels and earnings aren't? usually, when everyone is hot and bothered about your products earnings don't lag revs. but hey, its a new world b/c intel stock went up. it is so amateurish to think a stock represents reality in the short term. intel was in better position 2 years ago and traded at a 40% discount. earnings aren't growing. hey, in 2 qs these nimrods are going to say intel is growing b/c the yty comparison will be favorable due to the one time compaq channel stuffing problem. they are nitwits.