SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mary Cluney who wrote (35933)11/12/1998 10:52:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Mary, V A L U A T I O N. It is a hard word to learn, but try to figure it out. You simply do not pay 30 times earnings for a company with no growth. The margins are down from two years ago and about to go lower after this seasonal blip.

Basically, you are in love with this company, why I don't know, and I am not. That's fine. But try not to be fooled by the half-lies and the postive spin they put on every story. They are scamsters and you have to learn to read betweent the lines.

It ain't gross income. It is earnings per share. You know, the stuff that hasn't grown at Intel for years.

Take off those rose-colored glasses and you may survive.

MB



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (35933)11/12/1998 12:39:00 PM
From: Joseph G.  Respond to of 132070
 
looks like INTC has more shares outstanding than all of the Cos. you listed combined ?

<<You are in denial. Intel has gross margins upward 53% and net income 1998 close to
$6B. Their net income is greater than gross revenues for these cos:

Dun & Bradstreet Bank of Boston Wells Fargo
Corning Ryder Systems Boise Cascade
Bethelhelm Steel Nike Bank of New York

Just to name a few.>>



To: Mary Cluney who wrote (35933)11/12/1998 3:28:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 132070
 
Nike? Bethlehem Steel? Corning? You left out The Earring Hut.