SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (41319)11/12/1998 11:33:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1571807
 
Elmer,
Personally, I guess the cost of a Celeron A at between $50-54 relative to the K6 at 35-38. So I don't have a problem with your $50 mark.

RE:"When the K6-3 appears, AMD's costs will obviously go
up and capacity will go down yet it will compete mostly against
the Celeron which is already shipping into the low cost market at
2x the K6-2 rate with the ability to drive prices significantly
lower while still offering Intel reasonable returns."
-------
Perhaps this is one reason why AMD is in no hurry to get the K6-3 to market. They need Mhzs at higher than what the Celerons have even though the K6-3 should blow away the Celeron clock for clock. I would think AMD would like to position the K6-3 against the Pentium II and Katmaiand not have to price it against the the Celeron. Let the K6-2 do that.
Jim