Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (14655)	11/12/1998 2:52:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

With defenders like this who needs lying criminal bastard Presidents. "I thought from day one, as I think today, that this was bad for the country," said one of Starr's defenders who now questions his tactics.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (14655)	11/12/1998 3:14:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

<<I'd guess the review will be like a parole hearing for Charles Manson. >> Think Manson ever stole from his mother's purse? I have a problem with this, "on behalf of a friendly nation," jargon that keeps popping up.

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (14655)	11/12/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: mrknowitall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Daniel - the "So What" light is on again. Just because there is someone who is sought out and published in the NYT to reinforce the writer's own slant with an opinion that it is bad for the country does not mean it is bad for the country. After all, your opinion is that Bill Clinton shouldn't be prosecuted for anything no matter how egregious. That's an absurd opinion, and there are some loonies out in liberal-land who share it, but you're entitled to keep defending it and him. But when you make statements of supposed fact, and then the "facts" are shown to not go your way, it is meaningless to wander off the subject and go blathering about someone else's opinion again and again. CLINTON IS A DRAFT-DODGING LIAR. What does the piece you keep bringing up have to do with that, other than you think Starr is the antichrist? Mr. K.