SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Asia Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Z268 who wrote (7471)11/12/1998 10:39:00 PM
From: RagTimeBand  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 9980
 
Malaysia Threatens to Deploy Air Force Fighters if Singapore Violates Airspace

I'd be interested in hearing comments from anyone who's located in this area.

Emory
-------------------------
Subject: Malaysia/Singapore
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 18:15:11 -0600 (CST)
From: alert@stratfor.com
To: alert@stratfor.com

_________________________________________

Try the Asia Intelligence Update
stratfor.com
_________________________________________

Global Intelligence Update
Red Alert
November 13, 1998

Malaysia Threatens to Deploy Air Force Fighters if Singapore Violates Airspace

On November 10, the "Utusan Malaysia" newspaper reported that the Malaysian Defense Minister, Datuk Sri Syed Hamid Albar, said Malaysia would deploy the Royal Malaysian Air Force fighter jets if there are encroachments into Malaysian air space by the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF). He insisted that the Malaysian government would not compromise on issues concerning the country's security and sovereignty. In short, "the government had taken various measures to act against such encroachments" including having "acquired an air defense radar system which is capable of immediately tracing aircraft which encroach into Malaysian air space." The Defense Minister, in winding up the debate on the 1999 budget for his ministry at the House of Representatives today, reported at least seven intrusions by RSAF aircraft since the airspace restrictions were put in place on September 18.

Relations between Malaysia and Singapore have been deteriorating rapidly since this summer. The tension began in August, during a disagreement over the location of a railway border crossing between the two countries. In September, tension increased following a release of an auto-biography by Singapore's elder statesman Lee Kuan Yew, in which he criticized Malaysia for fomenting the 1964 race riots. In response to these charges, Malaysia terminated on September 18 -- two days later -- the special privilege it had extended to the Singapore military planes to use its airspace.

Within one week of the revocation, Singapore's rescue helicopters were denied access to Malaysian airspace, which they requested in order to conduct a search for a missing British pilot, whose helicopter crashed during a joint Singapore-Britain naval exercise in South China Sea off the east coast of Malaysia. Because the rescuers skirted around Malaysian airspace in reaching the scene of the crash, 12 vital minutes were lost; and the British pilot was not rescued. Malaysia finally issued a permit four hours after it had been requested. Due to the fact that a British pilot died, this situation has attracted international concern.

The heart of the problem lies not merely in a dispute over airspace or sovereignty. It is more of an example of how the Asian economic crisis is spilling over into the realm of politics. Malaysia is about to become the focus of world attention because of the Asian Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit to be held this weekend. Malaysia is both an avowed opponent of the U.S. sponsored reforms that the IMF has imposed in order to bail Asia out of the crisis and a staunch supporter of the Japanese plan of an Asian economic bloc based on regional currency controls and stabilization packages. Singapore, on the other hand, having fared relatively well during the crisis has almost whole-heartedly backed the U.S. plan. Adding to the tension between the two countries is the fact that Singapore is appalled over the poor treatment to which Anwar Ibrahim has been subjected.

By restricting Singapore's use of its airspace, Malaysia is indicating that saber rattling can amount to economics by other means. In other words, by closing off its airspace and threatening to shoot down violators, Malaysia is sending Singapore a signal that it has another option in pressuring Singapore into the Japanese bloc that doesn't involve using banks, currency controls, and financial pressure. In a wider context, Singapore and Malaysia are both part of ASEAN, and a further breakdown in relations between the two countries could have significant impact on the future of that structure. Note well that Singapore has a number of significant defense agreements with the U.S., among which is an agreement to provide U.S. Navy ships with bases for refueling. Should this conflict between Singapore, a bastion of seaborne international commerce, and Malaysia, a proponent of regional solutions to the international economic crisis, become more intense, it is possible that the U.S. would be drawn into a conflict between these two countries.

The British pilot, who died, in part, due to a botched search and rescue operation, was but the first casualty in the diplomatic spat between the two countries. All the repercussions from this incident have not occurred. Should Singapore attempt to test the resolve of the Malaysian Air Force, the next incident may lead to a resolution of their economic differences through other, potentially, military means.

___________________________________________________

To receive free daily Global Intelligence Updates, sign up on the web at stratfor.com, or send your name, organization, position, mailing address, phone number, and e-mail address to alert@stratfor.com
___________________________________________________

STRATFOR, Inc.
504 Lavaca, Suite 1100
Austin, TX 78701
Phone: 512-583-5000
Fax: 512-583-5025
Internet: stratfor.com
Email: info@stratfor.com



To: Z268 who wrote (7471)11/13/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: Jerry in Omaha  Respond to of 9980
 
Mr. Yeo,

<<Jerard, This is one scary article!>

Only when you make promises you cannot keep, Stephen. <G>

The parable of John Allen Paulos' zero-tolerance-wives mirrors a mathematical metaphor, something we may otherwise find too opaque to consider. In this case recent global economic events are modeled as a cascading series of rational steps taken by rational systems operating under codified conditions all leading to a correction possibly of catastrophic dimensions. Ramsey wonders if more regulation is in order. I wonder if it's just a different point of view that is needed.

Metaphors enlighten and metaphors deceive. I wonder if it makes a real world difference which metaphors we choose to use. Ideas such as "contagion" to describe real world events have distinct advantages. They are easily understood and carry huge amounts of meaning to everyone. But does it make a difference whether or not it's an accurate metaphor? Or, if it's being used as a propaganda tool, does it make a difference that the metaphor achieve its mission?

It seems to me that the metaphor tool of "contagion" is used in an attempt to enforce the nebulous notion of an economic "moral hazard" especially as applied to the workings of the IMF lately. An analogous situation would be the use of scare tactics about AIDS as an attempt to reform personal sexual behavior into a more acceptable mode; abstinence and behavior modification in the case of AIDS, and quarantine and austerity with contagion. It seems to me that in the process of the manufacture of consent (which is the objective of all propaganda -- white or black) the more accurate the metaphor the more effective the campaign.

It further seems to me that some metaphors are better than others and the use of them might lead to a different perspective ultimately to better procedures. I posted that article because I thought it contained just such a metaphor; a description of the world that, to me at least, more accurately reflects real world goings on. But Mr. Poulos' parable has more to offer being rooted in mathematics not culture, and as such can maybe do a much better job of enforcing the critical concept of "moral hazard" especially as it applies to free-wheeling policies of monolithic economic entities.

Jerard P