Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (5832)	11/13/1998 9:03:00 AM
From: charles moore	Respond to of 7491

"Too far intelligent"?As far as ignoring a post I think others need to see some facts that you and "your joined at the hip other" have ignored in trying to mislead people. Over 30 years ago a young Company by the name of "Haloid" was trying to start a Business that had a new Concept.The company did not have enough money to pay all their people so the Salesmen were paid in Cash but the Management was paid in Stock and Cash and everybody believed in the Company and the ones that took Stock became Wealthy in most cases. The Company later changed its name to "Xerox". Today there are Companies that are just starting up that do not have enough Money to pay all their expenses and so they issue or use Stock in the Company to pay for certain things. This type of payment is mainly used in the PR area. There are Companies that go overboard and over-extend themselves in this way and do not have the Future earnings to Compensate. A perfect example is TFRY which had to have a reverse split and still hasn't come out of it. On the other end of the Spectrum are Stocks that have had reverse splits and have gone on to do quite well. Two are THQI and MDRX.THQI went to 32 from 4 in 18 months. There are also PR firms that are solely in the Business to Hype certain Stocks for which they are paid in Stock and depending on the restrictions they turn over as soon as possible. Although rare there are Stocks that are of the caliber of THQI but use these firms. There is then no way that a person can make a blanket statement except on the Merits of the Stock itself or the absence of any Positives should that be the case.You are your "loved one" have presented no evidence that CSHK used any of these Companies. And even if they had this does not necessarily mean that the Company in Question is in any way a problem. So my question remains. Why even mention it without the facts or at least some condition or qualification tied to it? I can only think of two when someone makes a statement with no facts and uses words such as "presume" or "presumption". It is either to deliberately mislead or the person making the statement is Ignorant. (continued)

To: EL KABONG!!! who wrote (5832)	11/13/1998 9:39:00 AM
From: charles moore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

Everyone on a thread does not invest and or speculate alike.I have Bonds(primarily Ginnie Maes). I have Growth and Income Stocks and I have Pure Growth Stocks and about 8-10% of the Value of my Portfolio is used for what most would consider speculation and it is all on the Boards here for all to see. I made a $12,000 profit in a month when ACCR went from 1.5 to 4.5 and it is now down. DGIV went from pennies to $8.00 a share and it is now at about 80 cents. The fact of the matter is that people cam make Money on these stocks whether they are good or bad in many cases.The other extreme was 18 months for THQI for over $9000.The fact is that everybody invests different and for Kerry and his "loved one" to make Blanket statements without knowing what the various parameters are for the different people here again is misleading and....... When I questioned it, your Buddy felt he had to defend you and instead of trying to debate me on the Facts he/she went right to my Profile to see if there was anything in which to attack me with. When you can't debate the facts then use "labels" or insults. I saw no baiting. I merely asked why a person who did not own a particular Stock would be so Interested that they would come on a Forum for that Stock.I am Semi-Retired and I don't have time to "cruise" all these boards and put inane comments on them.I would hesitate to make any comments because if that Individual is later shown to be wrong they will look like a "Fool". Even if they are proven to be right it will be considered "Luck" because they offered no Facts but words like "presume".It is a lose-lose situation and only a Fool would put themselves in that Position. I offer no opinion and should I be proven incorrect then I will lose if it goes to "0" about a months worth of Stock Dividends so there is no big loss here. Another Fact to consider is that in over 50% of the cases, a spin-off turns out to be worth more than the Parent Company that spins it off. I used to give Indicators of which Stocks I was interested in and would tell people not to take my word for it and do their own Homework ,but after people like yourself came on the Boards I stopped. I am sure others have taken this attitude also. I have two stocks right now that I bought a month ago and they are up 50%.Meanwhile my past ones are on the boards for all to see. No ,Kerry I don't need to hold my breath and worry about you and your buddy being too intelligent for me. I think everybody on this board can see you both for what you are and the reasons you refuse to answer three simple questions. 1. Are your misleading and non-factual statements designed to try and sent the price down further. 2. Are you both members of the "Moral Police" who feel it is their Duty to protect us from ourselves and our Money? 3. Are you both just Ignorant? Please explain to us what other reasons there would be for someone who has no position in a particular Stock and feels it is a risk would want to cruise the boards and make misleading and/or false comments. Meanwhile I would be more than happy to debate any stock as to its financials etc or any Business concept if you are interested in making a bigger Fool of yourself. Charles