SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (4976)11/13/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: lws  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
Hi, Larry,

FYI, I agree with you, although I buy everything Paul just said. I did not hear an incorrect premise go by. Indeed, it was not that sort of question, where such a flaw in a technically involved argument could be legitimate basis for dismissing the substance of the question. It was a general question asking Lev to respond in some way to the contractual importance of the approaching date of 1/27. It was an opportunity for Lev to address issues thought important by many investors in any way he wanted, with whatever nuances and spins he thought appropriate. He should have been prepared for this question. He should have been up on the basic provisions of the agreement. Instead he looked (sounded) silly. It was not his finest moment.

Regards, lws



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (4976)11/13/1998 12:05:00 PM
From: kolo55  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27311
 
I would respond to you, but we'd disagree on the question.

I believe the questioner asked a different question than you stated. Since its my memory, perhaps someone who recorded the call could replay that section, and post the actual questions posed by that questioner.

Paul