Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (306)	11/14/1998 5:52:00 PM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1996

Chief, recieved investor packet in the mail today. A couple of comments. It includes a map that clearly shows the copper/gold veins in relation to the breccia zone. Almost all the veins are Southeast about 1 to 3 kilometers away. It does appear to me to be a relationship between the veins and breccia zone; however, curious that most are a good distance to SE. Suggests to me that the subsurface intrusive may not be under the breccia cap at the surface-something may have been shifted/faulted away? Seems odd. In regards to the overburden, the investor package clearly indicates signinficant overburden is present over the suspected porphyry. There is a sketch that compares the Corin to the Los Pelambres which clearly shows the an erosional level coparision-the Los Pelambres caped is significantly thinner than the Corin. I didn't see where you came up with your over burden info. In regards to the drilling that has already been completed. I checked the coordinates of the drill holes to the geology map provided; looks like the drilled right down where the surface features indicated is the center but the results where dissappointed. This to me means that we either have just a plain vanilla copper porhyry or my theory that the intrusive has been displaced to the SE is reason that the drill results missed the porphyry. What do you think? Thanks.