Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SPIDER & RICO'S 'NO-BASH' THREAD FOR LGCY !!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (192)	11/13/1998 7:29:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 296

This time it was red wine, dammit! Gotta stop giving me the giggles, I MEAN it. janice i can do no more to save you. PLEASE don't try. I'm doing just fine, thanks. dtc sheet show andy mann continue to short naked through pacific intl. Um, I thought that was Marcasse??? That's what you've been saying for the last week, lololol. You really DON'T know a damned thing, do you? As for VK and his own 100K shares, normally people sell restricted stock as soon as they register it. With regard to this particular case, I suggest you check once again with your Masters. & also stock NEVER REACH TA! Well, since there isn't any TA, this outcome is not especially surprising, is it? Has Mikey yet got round to registering with the SEC or not? Perhaps his plan is to hold up all restricted shares forever. So much easier than going to court to cancel 'em. i suggest you do same to save yourself. Turn State's evidence? About what? Let me remind you once again, you idiot, criminal charges have to be brought before anyone can "turn State's evidence". Apparently you still don't get it. But then your grip on the law is tenuous, as you've demonstrated countless times. tonto is wrong that papers are in chicago. You REALLY have no idea how funny this is, but I'm not gonna explain. Ask tonto. those who tell me about andy mann ask many questions. Why? If they're telling YOU, why should they have questions? And why should anyone assume you have direct knowledge of any of the facts in this case? Why, to continue, would anyone imagine that you, with your huge flapping mouth and inability to recognize or tell the truth, should be trusted with useful information? you will not order products. No. I don't want any of their products. So what? I haven't ordered any routers from Cisco lately, either. now run off & ask bob bell why 127 cases of ton are sent to sweet factory distribution center today. Hey, why don't YOU do that? Did they ever return your call? Gee, guess not. C'mon, now: time for your meds...