SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (8955)11/14/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: Les H  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13994
 
WHERE REPUBLICANS NEED TO GO

By DICK MORRIS

AS the Republicans sift through the wreckage of their bold
election hopes and contemplate life in the post-Gingrich era, it
is time they took account of certain basic realities.

Like many political movements before it, today's GOP is the
victim of its own success. Its achievements in helping to defeat
Communism, balance the budget, reform welfare and reduce
crime have left it without issues. Just as Winston Churchill lost
office in 1945 because he was no longer relevant after he had
won World War II, so the GOP has little relevance to the new
world its own accomplishments have created.

The 1996 election proved that the Republicans could not find
an agenda by moving to the right. The 1998 vote proves that
they can't find it by descending into scandal-hunting.

To be relevant in the future, the GOP must adjust to the new
facts of life. Bill Clinton restored the relevance of the
Democratic Party after 12 years of defeat by addressing
Republican issues that the rest of his party had long denied
existed. By showing tremendous achievements on these GOP
issues - the budget, welfare, crime, etc. - he cleared the deck
so that he could focus on traditional Democratic areas of
concern - education, the environment, and the elderly.

The GOP has won on all of its basic issues. Only leftovers -
abortion, opposition to gun controls, etc. - remain on the table,
and these are never going to be winners. Just as Clinton
developed a Democratic approach to Republican concerns,
the GOP needs to develop a Republican approach to
Democratic issues.

1. Admit that education is a national issue. One of President
Clinton's major achievements has been to make public
education the No. 1 domestic issue in America. When he took
office, schools regularly topped the list of concerns at the state
level, but were not a national issue. Just as Nixon took crime
out of the exclusive domain of local government and made it a
federal question as well, Clinton has nationalized the education
problem.

Democrats lost two decades of elections because they failed
to realize that Nixon had nationalized crime as an issue.
Republicans must not fall into the same trap. The Republican
Party cannot be politically relevant unless it recognizes that
Washington has a legitimate role in education.

Advocacy of vouchers and school choice is not an education
policy. Voters want the GOP to improve public schools, not
abandon them.

The voters do back school choice - as one of a number of
steps to upgrade educational quality. Republicans should
follow up on that: Focus on teacher quality - the one place the
unions will not let the Democrats tread. In Arkansas, Bill Clinton
was elected governor again and again because he tested
teachers and fired the ones who failed. But he has not had
similar courage in Washington. The Republicans can turn his
flank and address the need for an end to teacher tenure and
the need for higher standards.

2. Recognize the environment as an issue. The Republican
Party needs an environmental position. Its intransigent
insistence that there no longer are any environmental problems
and that government regulations need to be curbed is a blind
spot that separates the GOP from the U.S.A. As reports of El
Nino, Hurricane Mitch, fires in Florida, drought in the Midwest
and floods in Texas make climate obvious to everyone, the
Republican Party needs to stake out a market-based
alternative to public regulation as the way to protect
environment.

Just as Clinton used gun control to win the crime issue, the
Republican Party needs to show how market mechanisms can
do a better job of environmental protection than can
government bureaucrats.

3. Fight the demand for drugs. The last three administrations
have gone as far as any can in policing our borders and streets
to keep drugs out. The only remaining step that shows any
promise at all is a concerted attempt to reduce drug demand
among our kids. Drug testing remains the best way to do it.

The GOP should back drug tests for high school students,
welfare recipients and public-housing tenants and should
promote tax incentives for drug-testing on the job. By drawing a
line in the sand over constraints on drug users - not just pushers
- the Republicans can regain the offensive on the drug and
crime issue.

4. Cultivate the voluntary sector. The Republicans should
demand that the bulk of the budget surplus go to the voluntary
and charitable sector. By defeating Dole with his 15 percent tax
cut, voters made clear that they are not in favor of simply
returning the surplus to the taxpayers. They want it to be used
for social good, but they distrust government as an instrument
to promote it. Enter the GOP.

Republicans should insist that ordinary taxpayers get a tax
credit, not just a deduction, for their charitable giving. The GOP
should ask that a large part of the surplus go to fund these
credits - which would flow not to organizations that the
politicians favor or those that win the fight at the trough, but to
groups that attract contributions from average people funded
through the government tax credit.

The Democrats own the public sector. The Republicans own
the private sector. But the future is in the voluntary sector.

NONE of these issues is as sexy as a scandal, but each will go
a long way toward giving the GOP a traction it now lacks. The
Republicans need only to look at the disasters of the past two
elections to see how badly they need some of these new
perspectives.