SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1655)11/15/1998 12:57:00 PM
From: whiskeyjack  Respond to of 2251
 
Thankyou for that interpretation. I had envisioned 186 as
a chamber as well but appreciate the explanation of differing
diamond counts. Very interesting to see how all the components
of this complex puzzle are linked together. Happy Sunday.
wj



To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1655)11/15/1998 1:28:00 PM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 2251
 
Thanks George&Walt It sure is good to have a couple of Guys that can
explain thinks in black and white.

PS Snap Lake is very Complex and In the End Wsp will come out a winner
after they do alot more drilling this winter.



To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1655)11/15/1998 1:57:00 PM
From: brian krause  Respond to of 2251
 
Are cone-sheets always formed by the magma exerting pressure from below or do some form as a part of the volcanic eruption landing on top of previous layers.

There are many cone-sheets around the world. Are they all formed the same way?



To: George J. Tromp who wrote (1655)11/15/1998 5:01:00 PM
From: The Fix  Respond to of 2251
 
Hello George, Walt and yourself have given an excellent analysis. In your theory of the cone sheet, Would the "spiget" be the pipe/Source of all these macros/micros? Assuming that it is than WSP should know where the source is? What's your take on this? Any assumtions/estimations as to how deep WSP must drill the source target?

fIXER