Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JAB International (JABI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred C. Porzio who wrote (4067)	11/15/1998 1:02:00 PM
From: Fred C. Porzio	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4571

To ALL: Larry's message (from Yahoo board) continued: Stockett's Response to Board Letter by: lstockett (51/M/Las Vegas, NV) 14898 of 14904 From: Larry Stockett To: shareholders of Brush Creek Date: November 14, 1998. Upon receipt of the letter from the Board of Directors Dated November 12th, which I received the afternoon of November 13th, I immediately introduced them to McLaughlin Engineering & Mining, a 35 person company located in Temecula, California. I have worked with one of their senior executives for the past year developing the U.S. Cement business plan. They not only have the capability to conduct engineering and construction work on our cement plant, but have significant experience in exploration, mining and reclamation. A few of their many customers that you gold mining shareholder might recognize include: Golden Queen Mining Company, Mohave, CA Glamis Gold Exploration Co, Mojave, Ca, Soledad Mountain Billiton Minerals, U.S. A. (A Division of Shell Oil Co, Mojave Cactus Gold Mine Co. (Hecla Mining Co.), Mojave, CA Big Dyke Mine, Randsburg, CA. They also constructed the major hotels, casinos, golf courses and factory outlet malls at State Line, Nevada, located a few miles from the site of our new cement plant. I have proposed that they become a subsidiary of Brush Creek, along with U.S. Cement at a price per share of $5.00 per share, without any reverse split. This would generate the maximum value to current shareholders and maximize the use of the tax-loss-carry-forward. They have over $6 million in annual sales and have re-invested their profits into construction and mining equipment, an 8,000 sqare ft. office building, and over $6 million in assets with over $5 million in net worth. While they are willing to consider this proposal, their final decision will depend upon whether I can solve Brush Creek's near term de-listing status. Continued on Next Post. Posted: Nov 15 1998 2:30AM EST