SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LK2 who wrote (176)11/16/1998 10:48:00 AM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1989
 
Larry, just do it! [subscribe to WSJ/Barron's]. If you had listened to
Abelson you'd probably have shorted IOM. Only to see all this
positive news this am...
Message 6431092

re >Maybe some of their wealth/smarts/luck would rub off on me <G>.<

You made my day. :)

Gottfried



To: LK2 who wrote (176)11/16/1998 11:56:00 AM
From: William Epstein  Respond to of 1989
 
Larry K;

Please pardon my oddball sense of humor but are you telling me your not right too often or that I don't acknowledge it very often to anyone. Neither, offends me. I can be irascible, sometimes. However, your thanks are appreciated.

About Barrons. It used to be an excellent publication, back in the 60's and then it went downhill. I don't know why that happened but I mainly buy it now for the short interest listings which appear once a month. Some of the articles are still very good. Most are useless to me because when I cook them down I find that they really don't provide much info. Perhaps, if I were more bond market oriented or mutual fund oriented or annuity oriented it might be of more value to me. I also have a deep distrust of much of the U.S. financial media because it is prone to misleading hyperbole, both good and bad, for the self aggrandizement of many unseen but interested parties. Some of the people on this BB have expressed the same thoughts. Nevertheless, I do read Barrons for whatever I can get from it. You have to make your own decision about it. May I suggest the Financial Times of London? A very good publication, available free, online.
PHOTOMAN



To: LK2 who wrote (176)11/16/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: Stitch  Respond to of 1989
 
Larry,

I have been subscribing to the WSJ for quite a while. I actually forgot I get Barron's also. Just never get there in the time I have for reading. Too much else to read. In any case...that Kam has got a way with words don't he? I can't believe he didn't just say f#@* em! <GG>

Best,
Stitch