To: Hockeyfan who wrote (3999 ) 11/16/1998 2:02:00 PM From: bob jordan Respond to
Is that the point? I forgot that you knew specifically what was going to happen to NRI over two years ago. Amazing that you seem to know specifically what is going to happen to stocks, yet I can not buy your mutual fund. Or is it more reasonable to say that you guessed what happened to NRI, as I did? Hindsight is always 20/20. That having been said, let me clear the record. This investment in NRI was the RISK portion of my portfolio. So, if I loose this investment, it's no big deal. I doubt anyone here bet the farm on NRI. But if they did, it was their choice and they will take responsibility for what they did. I would not fault a man for making a decision on his own about a stock. I would fault him for listening to someone else's opinion on a stock board, and acting on that. Ultimately, we all make our own decisions. I would rather loose 100% on my investment in NRI than take any of your BS advice. Secondly, what the hell are you talking about "another of my investments go bankrupt?" How do you have such intimate knowledge of my portfolio? Same way you knew about NRI's future "over two years ago?" Well, this time you're wrong. My portfolio is doing quite well thank you. In fact, outside of NRI, the other companies I own have a market cap of at least 200 million. So I doubt they are going to go under anytime soon. But if they do, I am sure you will give me over two years notice and next time I will take your advice. Finally, I don't like "the sarcastic tone of some (try all) of your posts." Which is why I reacted with the same amount of sarcasm, maybe more. But, you see, I was reacting to constant criticism of NRI. As a great song says: I "didn't start the fire." It all comes down to my theory of make your choices and stick by them. That was the reason I didn't listen to "the voices of reason." That and there was no reason in your posts. I give no weight to statements of "NRi sucks," when there is no REASON given. And when no reason is given to a stated hypothesis, I dismiss it as a guess disguised as an opinion. The chromosome theory you have simply doesn't work. You see, if you don't sleep with your cousins, it's rare to have chromosomal abnormalities. So while chromosome deficiencies is a valid criticism of the people you know, society in general doesn't face the problem in such fearsome proportion. Include me in the society in general pile. For the record, I have a full set of chromosomes. Guessing about that too, huh swami?
