SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neal davidson who wrote (16957)11/16/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Neal

Based on the tests results we have seen, and the amount of proof put to the table to date, I would say that money must be going to paying their salaries 100%. IMO, Naxos should stop paying them any money whatsoever, cover any costs associated with getting a DEFINITIVE answer, and then either proceed or sever the relationship completely.

There is no reason to keep these guys on the dole, with absoutely zero tangible results to speak of. YOu cant count the results from OVER a year ago, because as we have heard countless times, the procedure now, is completely different than what it was then. We are paying for some new process, that according to available information, has produced absolutely nothing.

Mark



To: Neal davidson who wrote (16957)11/16/1998 2:21:00 PM
From: Tom Frederick  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
Neal, I only recall that number from a posting here. I believe it was a while back reviewing our status with J/L and I don't recall the breakdown of those costs. If anyone else could clarify or correct my figures, please jump in here.

Tom F.