Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Big D who wrote (15049)	11/17/1998 12:29:00 AM
From: Axxel	Respond to of 67261

Abortion up to about the age of 17 is OK in my book...It would surely loosen up the freeways.

To: Big D who wrote (15049)	11/17/1998 12:44:00 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

How long will it take before the "in crowd" decide that the aged and feeble are also not wanted, just a burden. The crowd that wants to be able to decide that is the HMOs i.e. big health-care businesses, not the "pro choice" groups. And guess who's buddy-buddy with those businesses? Dipy.

To: Big D who wrote (15049)	11/17/1998 1:37:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

<<The medical and moral definition of abortion is murder>> Untrue, your definition of abortion is murder.<<how long will it be before the in crowd decide that the aged and feeble are also not wanted just a burden >> What self serving nonsense. Please tell me what evidence you have to suggest that the aged and feeble will be dismissed in the manner you claim? By permitting a woman have control of her own body? Abortion has been around for a long time now. Still don't see any one suggesting that my aged relatives be put to death because of their age. pez