Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James1000 who wrote (3606)	11/16/1998 11:11:00 PM
From: jw	Respond to of 14778

James, now that you have posted, just click on Respond to your last post and respond, (whatever). You are talking to yourself, and we would be privy to hear what you have to say <g>. Am sure there are other ways, Regards, /jw Another is to put a o (zero) in the Reply Box, hit enter, then respond to ZP's Zero post. (did i get this right?)

To: James1000 who wrote (3606)	11/17/1998 9:36:00 PM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14778

>>What is the best scanner for internet page use only.<< I believe the better question is what is the best type of image for web pages? I use Ulead Photoimpact 4.0 ($100 +/-). The program has a web optimizer function. You save with the optimizer and it gives you options for compression vs quality. The scanner choice will depend on what you are scanning and the resolution. If you have a small high quality source image and want to enlarge it you will need a better quality scanner. Zeuspaul