Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cicak who wrote (9880)	11/17/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: slaffe	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 44908

Me ass kicker? No. not really, I just take issue with fellows like that one I responded to on microcapchat. He didn't make sense advising folks to sell then admitting he has no stake but expects tsig to be a buck soon and then he will get in. Why would he tell folks to sell if he thinks it's going to be a buck soon? If things pan out as we expect then a nice run is due for tsig. Baby could be walking and talking fast. Terrible two's here we come. When a nice 10q comes out showing profitably, baby will go from terrible two to adulthood overnight. We know that. In the last two trading days I am sure tsig got a lot of notice. I am surprised--very-- that we have not seen any bashers. That I have received no flame. I think it is imperative that baby be allowed to grow at his own pace -- which is quick and unimpeded by bashers. When a basher comes on board, if that person has legitimate questions then they need to be answered. For that shows interest and a good possibility of changing that person from a interested person with questions to perhaps a solid long term long. It is the solid long term longs that will ultimately prosper. Now how about some food for thought. Today, cdnw closes at 12.18, volume of 1,000,300, half sells, half buys. $12.18x1,000,300=$12,183,654.oo x.50 (half sells, half buys) =6,091,827.oo. 6.1mil!! same formula ntki equals $7,654,221 same formula ktel equals $32,529,163 same formula tsig equals $275,818 This is absurd! Now sean wants to do a si share count. I bet a lot of folks didn't respond to him. I wouldn't if I owned substantial shares. Like over 1m, that sounds like a lot but 1m shares at today's price could be had for a measly $270,000 or so. Sean is concerned about the float, wants a small float so this thing will fly on little volume. I say that most of our float is in tightly held hands now and there is actually very little available for trading. It was evident in today's trading. I noticed the price would go up on little buying, but would take a lot of selling to knock the price down. So what's the point of all of this! We know that tsig is needs money. We know (at least we hope we do) that a pp is coming. What if the pp is not necessary? What if nobody sold from now til christmas? I know dreaming but if that were the case, if we had all buyers and no sellers then the price should easily be 4 or 5 bucks or more, right? If that were to be true then RG would not need the pp, he could simply issue a FEW shares, minimal dilution. Would anybody here object to this? Are not our competitors using share value as corporate currency? Why shouldn't we as well. Let us continue to hold or buy and watch as the net frenzy, the christmas season and upcoming pr's catapult tsig to the point where the pp is no longer necessary. In the meantime I expect bashers to come on board to try to warn us about something that we already know but what new investors may not know. To that end I invite all who read this to pm me with sites that are talking about tsig so that I may go there as well to make sure both sides of the story be told. Slaffe not an investment advisor, not being paid for this. to each his own, please do your own dd to determine your cup of tea, mine happens to be tsig.