SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (21510)11/17/1998 1:18:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Slate's Coverage of Microsoft Trial Is Proving Difficult nytimes.com

That Kinsley, what a nut, went and hired some NYT writer. Those guys have an attitude problem.

On Oct. 19, Lewis fired off his first tart dispatch. He wrote that Microsoft's chairman, William H. Gates, looked in his videotaped testimony "as if he had swallowed a bad oyster." He continued, "I doubt any sane and reasonable man could come away from today thinking anything but that Microsoft is guilty of many awful things, and if those things aren't strictly illegal, they should be."

Lewis's correspondence seemed mightily unfettered by Microsoft. He referred to a Microsoft lawyer, John Warden, as "a great Hogarthian ball of pink flesh with jowls that ripple over his white, starched shirt." Lewis dismissed the "ineptitude" of the Microsoft lawyers.

In his last missive on Nov. 5, he described another Microsoft lawyer as having "the warmth of a corpse." He added, "If the courtroom population were asked to vote who in the chamber was most likely to be a vampire, he'd win."

Kinsley joked about the close relationship between Slate and Microsoft in his regular letter from the editor. On Oct. 23, he posted a disclaimer of sorts in his weekly "Read Me" column: "Lewis's views do not reflect those of Slate magazine, its editors, or its advertisers. Especially its editors."


Cheers, Dan.