SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ish who wrote (15125)11/17/1998 11:42:00 PM
From: Big D  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 67261
 
Ish,
pezz is all po'd because she/he/it is in a box and knows it.
It's logic is so ludicrous and indefensible, two humans copulate and create a bag of un-human cells, really?

Since there's no crying that one can hear, therefore, it can't be a human offspring. It's just a collection of unlinked, unformulated, nongeneric, mass that has no biological reference to it's parents. Just a by product of sexual gratification and a momentary annoyance that can be eradicated, snip, snip.

Sick minds can rationalize anything.




To: Ish who wrote (15125)11/18/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: pezz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
<<you release a Trout for the offspring ..but you want to kill human babies the moment they are born >>Ish, No sense using PBA as an issue.I only support it when the Psycial health of the mother is at stake. Tell me if your wife or daughter were told that if she came to term she would have severe spinal cord injuries what would you want her to do? I have been told on this thread that that can't happen. If so fine but why not let a doctor make that determination? I don't release Trout because of any moral consideration for the fish's offspring I do it because I want the offspring to be there as opposed to none.As you well know we have lots of people. Abortion or no.
<<Ah what is the definition>> Not sure but surly not before it can live on it's own.<< all premature should be killed as an aberration>>Not so. Why kill an aberration?
<<you squash a caterpillar have you killed the butterfly it would have become?>> Are you making an argument against birth control in general here?
pez