Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GM - General Motors -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David C. Burns who wrote (140)	11/18/1998 5:59:00 AM
From: Thomas Haegin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543

David, forget Research Week. We are smarter and hold on. There is so much still going on at GM that will not realize overnight. RW is basically a broker or so I understand. I see their posts on various boards already, and I think it's offensive anyway to blatantly peddle any business here on SI. They want to generate business whereas we want GM to execute on their laid-out strategy in which I strongly believe :-) kind regards, Thomas

To: David C. Burns who wrote (140)	11/20/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: Research Week	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543

Response to Mr. Burns: Thank you for your response. We appreciate your support. We have years of experience on Wall Street. With the greatest respect, I think you are somewhat confused. Every research firm including ours changes targets based on hundreds of factors. When a research firm changes their ratings, is that feeble? When they change their target prices, is that feeble? I do hope that your returns match the returns in our track record. I believe our research is everything other than feeble. If you think otherwise, then we respect it. To label our research as feeble is wrong. That's your decision and your right. Thank you and best of luck. Research Week Inc.