Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Toups Technology Licensing, Inc (TOUP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: attaboy who wrote (91)	11/18/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: Howard Williams	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 317

>>>on balance positive economic benefit<<< each of us has a right to believe what we want to believe. About a month ago I spent hours reading all the TOUP stuff I could find......and that was a bunch as you well know....including the Santilli report as I recall. This week, I've read this thread and reread the enormous, somewhat-less-than-humble, October 14 press release. My conclusion, based on my understanding of the laws of physics, is that many AquaFuel claims, embedded in an ENORMOUS amount of tech talk, do not make sense. Some of Mr. Clancy's e-mail answers to Andrew, especially his free AquaFuel just from letting a city's power flow through an AquaFuel apparatus, are not IMO credible. If the AquaFuel story as presented by TOUP was true, it would be an enormous breakthrough. I don't believe it is. If it was true, a hybrid electric car could generate AquaFuel just by letting the electric current pass through an onboard AquaFuel generator.....filling a tank as it went down the road. Then switch to an AquaFuel combustion engine to drive further or recharge the battery.....and so on and so on. Talk about mileage and range..... I anxiously await definitive answers from the TOUP science team. H.W.