Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: s. bateh who wrote (4330)	11/18/1998 12:28:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10072

>>These so called analyst....first they say they don't see much promise in this area ...<< "So-called?" I think being employed by respected publications such as TheStreet.com and Barrons qualifies them as Analysts in every sense of the word. And after all, they have been right about Iomega all this year. Iomaniacs have been woefully incorrect. Let's do a quick run down: Price cuts continue = margins suffer greatly Revenue shrinking year to year Still zero Vapor! built-in announcements from D. cameras or PDA's. Vapor! delayed yet again until "Late 4th Q or First Quarter 99." (Expect another Vapor! delay to at least 2nd Qaurter 99) Sony one the way. = Zip in trouble ORB on the way with real OEM's. Not "endorsements." = Jaz is toast Shamefully bad PR skills by new CEO Jodie "Rubber Stamp" Iomega. Couldn't get real established CEO. Had to pick from the second or third tier of executives. Zip250 = lower tie ratios Still selling OEM Zips at a loss. And much much more. IOM is rated an AVOID.