To: pezz who wrote (15199 ) 11/18/1998 10:01:00 PM From: jbe Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
Whoa -- pezz, ish, WhoMe, all you pro- and anti-abortion warriors.. You could take a tip, IMO, from this organization (The Common Ground Network for Life and Choice), which tries to promote dialogue between pro-lifers and pro-choicers: searchforcommonground.org And pez, you seem to believe that only the RR opposes abortion, and maintains that life begins before birth. Not at all. There are some very sticky ethical (not just religious) issues involved in abortion, and philosophers have been arguing over them for some time. See, for example, the comprehensive bibliographical review on this site:ethics.acusd.edu Now, I happen to be a liberal who is very uneasy about abortion. And, IMO, to view the abortion debate as being simply over the "right of women to control their own bodies" is very mistaken. I am not alone in this. See, for example, this brief review of a 1995 New Republic piece by Naomi Wolf, entitled "Our Bodies, Our Souls: Rethinking Pro-choice Rhetoric": ..A very interesting and thought-provoking article by the author of The Beauty Myth, who maintains "that we need to contextualize the fight to defend abortion rights within a moral framework that admits that the death of a fetus is a real death; that there are degrees of culpability, judgment and responsibility involved in the decision to abort a pregnancy; that the best understanding of feminism involves holding women as well as men to the responsibilities that are inseparable from their rights; and that we need to be strong enough to acknowledge that this country's high rate of abortion--which ends more than a quarter of all pregnancies--can only be rightly understood as what Dr. Henry Foster was brave enough to call it: "a failure." Finally, I recommend that anyone really interested in this issue take a look at this article, published in the Atlantic Monthly, also in 1995. The author advocates taking a "Lincolnian" position against abortion. I will not attempt to summarize the article, which develops some highly interesting arguments:theatlantic.com jbe