Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Who, me? who wrote (15216)	11/19/1998 12:16:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

I believe Michelle not you. pez

To: Who, me? who wrote (15216)	11/19/1998 2:35:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

You sure can dish it out, Who?, but you can't take it. Sorry, I just don't like self righteous pompous hypocrites. You're such a paragon of the Religious Right. Sinless as ever, aren't we Who? Got any more stones handy for me? Or maybe you'd prefer to just go tell Bob. Then again, maybe you're too gutless to do that yourself, you'll have one of your chivalrous buddies here do it, eh, Who, Me? Sorry, I just don't like self righteous pompous hypocrites. Gutless self righteous pompous hypocrites are even worse. Gutless self righteous pompous hypocrites who brag about getting people kicked off are worse yet. Gutless self righteous pompous hypocrites who brag about getting people kicked off , profess their good inerrant Leviticus-based sinless "Christian" faith publicly, but feel the need to cast stones at people they've gotten kicked off, when it's clear they won't respond, are contemptible. Recognize anybody in that description, Who, Me? Go tell Bob.