Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (5308)	11/18/1998 10:42:00 PM
From: gvander	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Page B14B of Wed. 11-18-98 Wall Street Journal

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (5308)	11/18/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: FMK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Larry, I still like Quashimoto's simple statement that he likes to buy stocks that go up. Quashi bought Valence after he noticed that Al Shugart did. He didn't find it necessary to post 20 times about the terms of the financing or 20 times about Valence's patents. He just thought Al Shugart was smart and that he too liked to buy stocks that go up. I'll bet Quashimoto would conclude that each new patent number of the 200 or so be sent via private E-mail to Zeev because he doesn't need to know them. I remain confident, of course, that he likes to hear how much profit line 1 can make! I hope you are looking forward to a strong day for Valence tomorrow. Regards, FMK

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (5308)	11/18/1998 11:02:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

Larry, remember this from the other day: 'when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout' and Larry Brubaker is wallowing in their own 'superior' rhetorical, circular logic. With attendant concentration on their own views being resolutely, absolutely, the only way to go. LOL

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (5308)	11/19/1998 8:59:00 AM
From: John Curtis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Larry: Cogent commentary related to the specifics at hand is ALWAYS welcomed, in my book. And I think everyone would have a hard time arguing with that, eh? However, self-aggrandizement and sycophantic hangers-on are another thing entirely. But I digress. This be only about VLNC, a speculation which clearly has provoked LOT'S of commentary, not to mention egotistical attitudes. But not all of it is irrelevant which just proves out the worth of SI for those folks attempting their own d.d.. Bottom line for VLNC? We need corporate corroboration of allllll the "stuff" we be hearing about of late, 'cause without it....well.....the circular commentary will continue in a "Waiting for Godoh--Will the batteries arrive? Yes, they're on their way. Have they been built yet? Are they worthy?" manner, eh? Regards! John~