SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (14326)11/19/1998 10:37:00 AM
From: melinda abplanalp  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 71178
 
Oh I think they should put Starr on this project as soon as he finishes with Clinton......when ever that may be.

That bad reporter.
That bad crack.
That bad crack dealer.

That good CIA?????????????????

Melinda



To: JF Quinnelly who wrote (14326)11/19/1998 9:23:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71178
 
The Los Angeles Times, The New York Times and the Washington Post did exhaustive stories finding Webb's articles inaccurate, inflated, or misleading in major respects.

We've been through this before, but it should be pointed out that the Columbia Journalism Review studied both Webb's series and the articles which challenged it, and concluded that while Webb's work was faulty, the critics focused entirely on its vulnerable points, and entirely overlooked serious issues that were deserving of further study.

"was virtually unobtainable in black neighborhoods before members of the CIA's army started bringing it into South-Central [Los Angeles] in the 1980s at bargain-basement prices."

A wild and ridiculous exaggeration, and a shitty piece of journalism, but does not change the truth that the CIA did knowingly work with and protect drug smugglers - as they had previously done in SE Asia.

the CIA swore in court filings in San Diego on Nov. 5 that it had no record of any contacts whatsoever with Blandon.

Well, they would, wouldn't they? I don't suppose you trust them any more than you trust the lefties, being a person of critical mind.

his articles don't actually say the CIA knew that persons in the Contra movement were dealing crack,

They don't have to. The CIA admitted it in the hearings. Oliver North's diary shows that he knew that aircraft carrying weapons from the US to Honduras also "probably" carried drugs into the US.

he intends to "explore a theory" that the Contra war "was not a real war at all. It was a charade, a smoke screen...to provide cover for a massive drug operation"

I'm no fan of the CIA or the contras, but that is downright stupid, and only distracts from real issues that need to be considered.

What I find odd is that anyone should consider it odd that the CIA would work closely with drug interests, since the SE Asian precedent has been so thoroughly documented. CIA people who worked with the SEA operations often expressed unconcern with the flow of heroin into the US, saying that it served a Darwinian function, eliminating inutile and parasitic members of society. I suspect that they thought of it much the same way in LatAm.

It's tempting to compare these acts to our support of Saddam during the Iraq/Iran war, or our sending Stinger missiles to those lovely democratic capitalists in the Afghan Taleban because we hoped they would use all of them against Russians. The CIA has apparently never realized that the enemy of your enemy is not always your friend.

Steve