SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (21569)11/19/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Reggie, in days past I would have been offended by this post. But having participated more than I should have in the local cesspools that pass for political debate forums here, I find it relatively tame. I have to compliment you in the extensive schooling you've given me in cheesy high school debate tricks, though. I never fully appreciated your relative politeness.

In the ad hominem department, perhaps you could explain this little bit of the Microsoft "defense"?

In a statement today, Microsoft contended that "Warren-Boulton's testimony is clearly that of an ivory tower consultant with little or no direct experience in the day-to-day business and competitiveness of the U.S. software industry."

I find that line a bit humorous, Chicago alumnus that I am. Microsoft's best defense line is the dreaded Chicago School economics and law thing. At the University of Chicago, "ivory tower" has long been considered a compliment, not a pejorative. But those economists are cut from a different cloth I suppose, except for Warren-Boulton of course. UC is certainly an appropriate place for an academic hotbed of the dismal science, the campus looks pretty grim from about now through April. Then, there's the other irony about that line:

Warren-Boulton has held a number of prominent academic and political positions. But perhaps most interesting for someone arguing for antitrust enforcement against Microsoft is that he was chief economist for the antitrust division of the Justice Department during the Reagan Administration, when the Government chose to pursue few antitrust cases.

What do you think, Reggie? Is the line here that Warren-Boulton, like Bork, was bought and paid for by the forces of evil? As opposed to his apparent ex-boss, Charles "Rick" Rule, who takes your Bill's side, because he really believes Microsoft has done nothing wrong?

I've long said that you friends of Bill should write to Congress, express your views, get antitrust repealed, or maybe get a more precise MLB-style statutory immunity for Bill. Sadly, one of Bill's newfound political friends, Lauch Faircloth, went down at the polls, he was a little too vociferous about that other Bill. I guess that leaves homeboy Slade Gorton, Mr. Salvage Rider, as the chief friend of Bill G. on the hill.

Cheers, Dan.