Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : e.Digital Corporation(EDIG) - Embedded Digital Technology -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: daaan who wrote (1568)	11/19/1998 11:10:00 AM
From: Walter Morton	Respond to of 18366

I was thinking about that also. It would depend upon how many shares of NCII I had at the time of the merger. If it still would out to a round number or block that would be easy to sale, it would not be so bad EXCEPT for the fact that ATCO may be 500% overvalued. I would not buy ATCO for more than $.90. And if I take into consideration that AVCO may increase shares outstanding again, I may not want to pay $.90. Having said that,my opinion on ATCO may change once their earnings numbers change (become positive).

To: daaan who wrote (1568)	11/19/1998 11:40:00 AM
From: Walter Morton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18366

If you merged the three companies (PTSC, ATCO, NCII) without cutting costs they would look like this: Sales $3.3 Million Loss $9.0 Million (based on latest SEC filings or Yahoo Profile annualized) The big question is how many shares would you divide that loss by to come up with the loss per outstanding share? The interesting thing is that NCII is making more revenue and incurring a smaller loss than ATCO, yet ATCO is selling for $4.18: NCII: Sales $.5 million Loss $1.8 million ATCO: Sales $.2 million Loss $3.2 million (based on latest SEC filings or Yahoo Profile annualized) quote.yahoo.com