Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal International Venture RIL.V (was Labrador Int'l LAB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stew who wrote (1504)	11/19/1998 10:27:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3380

Another thought just struck me???????? If these anomalies represent a conductor at depth then they must have broad, relatively low amplitude profiles..........in all dimensions including N-S and E-W. This is peculiar because this is virtually a single line anomaly. Thus a profile in an E-W direction must be fairly sharp and not indicative of a body at great depth. In fact if we look at the N-S profile the lack of yellow colour (mid-spectrum) indicates a pretty high gradient into background and this again would not indicate a very deep body. In fact it seems that this should be a fairly shallow body (<<200m roughly) and if that is the case (100-200m depth) it would have to represent a fairly small body. Perhaps <50mx50m! It seems only logical that this body would be rather small to be discretely occurring in this situation and given past results may indicate a more heavily mineralized zone within the gabbro "sill". This mineralized "sill" would be trending NWN beneath the mapped gneiss and connecting the north and south mapped gabbros. just thinking out loud sorry for verbosity. Hell the data might represent blueberry concentration for all I know. 1King