Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal International Venture RIL.V (was Labrador Int'l LAB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J. Kittle who wrote (1505)	11/19/1998 9:48:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3380

That Golden Bear target bull's eye is so big and so dark that they hardly need to drill. They could just declare it a mine, Take the map to the bank and get the financing. Now that I think about it, if they made the bull's eye any bigger they would probably already have a big run up in the stock price. Donner probably put out their crap NR just to try and keep a damper on things. And I love my mother-in-law.

To: J. Kittle who wrote (1505)	11/19/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 3380

JK, Thats Neat! Sure you can buy more at 0.19. With the last run up and kick at the can to go there should be room for profit, as long as no bitter rivals at SVB f with the "program"! I am hoping anyway!!! Here is my humble opinion 1) The EM plot has no quantitative value without info on what channel we are looking at. We need to see a plot like this for something like Ch 5 and then maybe high Ch 30's if this is low frequency survey (1.5 Hz). Everything is relative. 2) That could be a crappy early time conductor with little range indicating no more than minor disseminated sulfides at the buried gabbro gneiss contact that probably runs through the survey area in a NWN direction. 3) It was obviously plotted by a geo-guy because the colours are reversed. Pet peeve but nothing serious if this is a resistivity plot I guess. 4) They show two gravity maps. However the data is different in each one! What data is what????? One shows a narrow E-W gravity feature cutting the across the top of the bullseye. I assume this is the proper file as this seems to correspond with the geology map (i.e. gneiss/gabbro contact). In this case there is little correlation between gravity and EM. 5) The other data is a more broad dispersed data set but judging by the spikes the data sets may or may not be related. There still is only weak correlation between gravity and EM but better correlation with regional geology trends. ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh maybe they are processing the data:-) 6) The EM is pretty discordant with surface geology and very closely related to the line orientation. I don't like that but I am sure this has been QC'd and is OK. Discordant EM to surface geology is interesting though. Indicates a buried gabbro "Sill" (by geometry only) beneath a thin gneiss pendant/slab which is also more in line with the regional picture???. 7) The info presented there is really no info. That is usually why we see it. 8) Questions to ask LAB tomorrow: 1) what channel of what data is it, and 2) what are the gravity maps actually representing and 3) what is the amplitude of the anomaly over background. This is from a quick glance, if I have FU just let me know. I am trying to put together the DML stuff but I cannot find the drill hole location data. My crappy web site also has me locked out so I cannot post graphics of all my BS:-) XOOM sucks and sucks hard .......never use XOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! FWIW 1King