Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (41901)	11/19/1998 8:40:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574574

Petz - Re: "Intel has never acknowledged that the superior McKinley design is, in fact, an HP design. " HP design, NexGEN design - why is one "bad" and the other the holy grail? Paul

To: Petz who wrote (41901)	11/20/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: Michael DaKota	Respond to of 1574574

Re:Petz : McKinley Well seems like the usual intel TM tactics, not ? I'm still a little bit confused about the real deal between intel and hp, especially because i don't see what hp needs so badly from intel they can't continue to design their own chips, without "help" from intel engineers... why would HP take the risc that creativeless intel designers try to implement old and long forgotten p-pro techniques, just because they don't know better than taking something old and making it a little better, and sell it as "revolutionary", if they [HP] can develop their own blistering fast risc solutions... I'm very pleased to read articles as the one you posted, keep going ;) FHWL, Michael da Kota