Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MoneyBaggs who wrote (11159)	11/20/1998 1:01:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

the Top Dog mouth. Unfortunately that mouth seems uncomfortably close to the StyleWriter posterior.

To: MoneyBaggs who wrote (11159)	11/20/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: RavenCrazy	Respond to of 11684

MoneyBaggs, you are altering my words. You said, >>First you state that you bought solely because Macker recommended a stock.<< No, Paul, that is NOT what I said. What I said was: >>I did buy INFE, but that was after Macker told us on the board of a press release that was coming out that day. (I even posted that I had bought - at 4.75/OUCH - and would owe it all to Macker<< Further translation: I did NOT buy on his RECOMMENDATION. I bought because he had been announcing PRs before they came out and I saw that they then DID come out (until the "really" bad guys had no more use for him), so when he said a PR on INFE would be out (I think he said in 15 minutes), I considered what had been happening and did buy. That was one instance, one unique instance, and afterwards, I am aware that had I not lost almost my whole investment in INFE, I would have technically been guilty of insider trading. Like most of us, I didn't think of it at the time. But PLEASE don't imply that I bought stocks on Macker's recommendation. Please don't take my words out of context, as you have a habit of doing. As for this one: >> never said that Macker got his info from the TopDog newsletter. I said he received it directly from the TopDog mouth.<< I don't believe you said he received it from the TopDog mouth. I believe you said he received it from Top Dog. Top Dog is a newsletter. And in the above response you neglected to address the point, which was that Macker was telling US on the board that his info was coming directly from Joe Gort and MTEI. To try to blame it all on Top Dog now seems a less than honorable way to respond to the people he damaged. Please decide. Ask him what you are to say and get it straight. Finally, you write: >>It sounds like the Kool-Aid left a bitter taste in your mouth.<< Yes, Paul. The "Kool-Aid" involved in this scam virtually ruined lives. Fortunately, mine wasn't one of them. But for those who truly drank the kool-aid and are now bankrupt, it left a VERY bad taste in my mouth. That is why I am spending a large amount of time hoping to contribute to an effort that will prevent this from ever happening again. And I have no agenda to plant any false defenses of ANYONE in this. Now PLEASE stop twisting my words. Raven

To: MoneyBaggs who wrote (11159)	11/23/1998 1:19:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11684

I have been looking over some of the documents that you posted on the web. I was struck by something that I think could use additional inquiry. If you look at the letter of intent to complete the asset acquisition for the exchange of the assets of Government Property Advisors and the 50 million shares of ICVI, it is most interesting to me that it was signed by Jack Uselton - Agent. This implies some agency agreement between GPA and Jack Uselton. Now it is my understanding that GPA prior to this was a Marc Tow company. So in effect, when Jack signed this agreement, he was acting on behalf of Marc Tow. twinjet.simplenet.com twinjet.simplenet.com Now we know from looking at the record of the shareholders that there were three certificates: 10 million with Pacific Tax Properties: twinjet.simplenet.com 10 million with Cortland Group: twinjet.simplenet.com 30 million with Western States Tax Defaulted Real Estate Fund, LLC:http://twinjet.simplenet.com/MTEI/Shareholders/list21.gif If we look at twinjet.simplenet.com we can see that these certificates were transferred directly to them on the say so of John Christensen on 5/21/98. This was presumably in fulfillment of the contract to acquire the assets. So what I am wondering is, where is the contract of actual assignment for these shares going to GPA? Where as well is the letter of understanding that Tow and Uselton must have had, for Uselton to have been able to sign that letter on Tow's behalf. I have to admit that it is a little unusual to have someone (Jack) sign a contract on behalf of a lawyer (Tow). It begs the question of exactly what Jack's relationship with Tow really was. At the very least, that letter of Intent had no clause preventing the further issuance of common shares prior to the closing of the final contract. Those contracts with Karvi and MLJ seem to pre-date (April 15) even this letter of intent (April 21). This claim by Jack of being duped and illegal shares being issued after the signing of the agreement seems murky on the basis of this, especially if it wasn't finalized until 5/21.