Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Ragan who wrote (2824)	11/20/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Sawtooth	Respond to of 9818

<<How would you make a case that the other 85% shouldn't be in the "At Risk" category?>> I'm obviously not Stewart but your question is a good one, so I hope you'll let me take a crack at it, too. Of course, every firm is "at (some) risk" from Y2K. I'd guess the organization has defined specific criteria based on their due diligence work that identifies a point at which business partners are either "at risk", based on the criteria, or not. Their documentation should clearly evidence how they arrived at their assessment.