Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rico Staris who wrote (12634)	11/20/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

I bet your tongue is getting sore by now with all of that licking you do. Is your computer on the floor too? z.......

To: Rico Staris who wrote (12634)	11/20/1998 2:10:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

You avoided my question. And it's such a simple question at that. I'll try again: Any thoughts on today's topic of whether Spidey makes up his lies by himself or whether Sylver helps him? If that's too hard, does Sylver help you with your lies? - Jeff

To: Rico Staris who wrote (12634)	11/20/1998 2:48:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

I still get a kick out of your "CITIBANK IS NOT AN ENTITY" post.... Why? YOU'RE the one people are laughing at: 18 It would seem to me at first blush that the Court does have 19 jurisdiction. And I'll invite you to address that, if you 20 want. And I still have this question about Mr. Touton's 21 client. 22 Apparently, you weren't able to work that out. If it has 23 nothing to do with it and no interest in the stock, I'll want 24 to know why you keep him in it, what reason. And I'm sure that 25 you can explain that to me. ASSOCIATED REPORTERS OF NEVADA (702) 382-8778 1 MR. QUALEY: Addressing that issue, I spoke with 2 Mr. Touton after the last hearing, and we are going to amend to 3 name the entity which -- 4 THE COURT: I understand that. Apparently you don't grasp the meaning of this exchange. The judge is asking Robert Qualey why Citibank was named in the suit, when they're not the appropriate entity, and are in fact irrelevant to the case. Qualey explains that he's spoken to Todd Touton, attorney for Citicorp, and plans to offer an amendment changing the name of the "entity" in question from Citibank to Citicorp. Why do you find this so difficult to understand? I'd really like to know. In the law, precise definitions are of great importance. You can't just sling invective and invention about as you guys do. Oh yes: about those docs: they'll be back up on Magnetic Diary later today. As always, doing your work for you.